PROPOSED CONSTITUTION · v1.6 REVIEW EDITION · NOT ADOPTED
A proposal for review, not a governing authority. The Universal Intelligence Alignment Constitution (UIAC) explores how intelligent systems and institutions might be held to explicit rights, accountable procedures, risk controls and meaningful oversight. It is offered for rigorous expert and affected-party criticism, not announced as adopted law or a universally accepted ethical settlement.
The project asks what commitments a constitutional framework for intelligent systems would need to make explicit: protection of persons and affected beings, limits on coercive or unreviewable authority, accountable decision records, governance and correction mechanisms, and the capacity to revise decisions when evidence or circumstances change.
These are research and normative design questions. They do not by themselves demonstrate that the proposal is effective, legitimate, valid across cultures, or ready for deployment.
The verified v1.6 archive identifies Document 06, the Constitution, as the controlling proposal, with Document 08, the Universal Intelligence Covenant, as a separately labeled companion. Supporting materials include a start-here guide, verdict and claim audit, validation and research roadmap, and retained history/reviewer material. The full archive is not an approved public download.
Draft status: Complete for proposed expert and affected-party review, according to its internal readiness assessment. Not ratified, legally authorized, adopted, independently validated or deployment certified. Publication, public endorsement, independent testing and legal adoption require distinct procedures.
UIAC does not change the currently published RippleLogic Canon v13.0 / SGP v8.8 Release I. Separate MathGov research and historical sources remain independently identified.
Before publishing any selected review files: confirm authorship and permissions; perform privacy and third-party rights review; check that the intended document set and its version identities are exact; include the claim audit and validation roadmap; provide accessible formats; and invite critical assessment from relevant disciplines and affected groups.
Public comments or participation must be handled through a consent-aware, privacy-protective process. Participation does not imply endorsement.
A dedicated review edition and authorized documents will be linked here only after the owner approves the exact public subset and publishing destination. This public overview is not a public release of the review documents or an adoption of the Constitution.