MathGov · RippleLogic
MathGov is an ethical-governance framework. RippleLogic is its rights-constrained decision architecture: ground the claim, protect non-compensatory floors, bound ruin, test whether the structure can stand, then rank only the survivors.
A later stage cannot rescue an earlier failure. A high score cannot repair an unsupported claim, buy a rights violation, average away ruin, or make a structurally non-viable option selectable.
Core v13.0 · SGP v8.8 · build Release I · 26 September 2026
Begin with the current introduction, explore the Primer, or follow the human journey. Full publications and searchable readers are one click away.
Start with Reality, Rights, Ripples: the public introduction to qualification, comparison, and the boundaries of the framework.
Current introduction · v13.0Prefer a visual overview? Five-minute teaching guide v1.0 (Core v12.6 / SGP v8.5) — retained teaching edition.
The technical-public bridge: why the architecture exists, what each layer does, what it does not claim, and how to read the full Core.
v4.7 · current introductory companionThe warm public doorway: lived origin, 3R, the 1–2 method, Union scopes, worked examples, SGP, practice, and the larger horizon.
v7.0 complete web reader and 184-page PDF now published · v6.5 remains available as historical editionThe architecture is now in stabilization: the emphasis shifts from speculative feature growth toward replay, measurement, disagreement, falsification, pilots, and public challenge.
Reality Grounding controls claim authority. Rights, tail risk, and structural viability determine the selectable set. RLS ranks only that set. If evidence cannot support a deterministic result, refusal is a legitimate output.
RGGround evidence, unknowns, causal pathways, configuration, and the strongest supportable claim.
RF/NCRCProtected floors are non-compensatory. Welfare elsewhere cannot purchase a rights breach.
TRCRuin-class and irreversible exposure are governed separately from ordinary expected benefit.
CSVContainment, dependencies, execution feasibility, repair, reversibility, governance, and future option space.
RLSResidual welfare ranking across the qualified set only. Uncertainty can force refusal.
RF/NCRC = Rights Floor / Non-Compensatory Rights Constraint. A failed protected floor is removed from ordinary trade-off arithmetic rather than “paid for” by benefits elsewhere.
Fixed illustration only. Not a live calculator, a validated result, or authority to act.
The grid is a coverage discipline. It makes omitted stakeholders, exported costs, and missing dimensions harder to hide. It does not pretend the world is reducible to 49 boxes.
Explore the governing specification, protection companion, implementation work, independent evaluation, and domain application. Each retains its own version and evidence requirements.
The principal specification for qualification, rights, tail risk, structural viability, the 7×7 field, RLS, refusal, and decision-to-action boundaries.
v13.0 · current specificationEvidence-governed moral patienthood, full protection, participation, stewardship, intelligence capacity, and reality-management capacity across substrates.
v8.8 · protection companionHuman-interface and orchestration companion: a complete standard, preparation workbook, schemas, synthetic examples and bounded record-consistency checks. All fifteen Core v13.0 source files are pinned unchanged. Local consistency is not authority or deployment readiness.
v2.1 · Core v13.0 Release I / SGP v8.8 · Apache-2.0A rights-protecting assurance protocol for comparing high-impact decision frameworks while permitting adverse and non-superiority findings.
v6.2 · 12-page methods submission draft + 104-page core protocol · canonical registry, test vectors, SHA-256 manifestsA claim-level assurance architecture for AI-mediated higher education: what competence is claimed, what evidence supports it, and what may legitimately follow.
v6.5 · 87 pages · JSON assurance-record schema and validatorOpen edition 1: code and schemas Apache-2.0; author-owned research materials CC-BY-4.0. Historical restrictive notices are superseded by the open-license grant.
Authority rule. Canon and SGP govern their declared domains. MHIOS implements without adding a cascade stage. Auditable Flourishing evaluates without inheriting MathGov validity. AIAP is a domain application with its own validation burden. Research papers provide arguments and hypotheses, not hidden operational authority.
SGP helps determine who or what requires protection, participation, representation, or role-specific scrutiny. RippleLogic evaluates candidate actions. SGP is a companion to the cascade, not an extra gate.
Fourteen DOCX masters govern the specification under Canon/SGP precedence; HTML, Markdown and PDF are reading projections. The XLSX controls its frozen worked example. Related research: ORSH / AIU.
ORSH = Open Relational Substrate Hypothesis; AIU = Absolute Infinite Union. A separate research collection on frame-aligned records, locality, and philosophical foundations.
Five works on quantum records, locality, and philosophical foundations. Read the papers, examine their evidence, download editable documents, and work with the supporting data and code.
The scientific argument: safeguards for comparing locality and records in quantum models.
Read online →Supporting mathematics, definitions, and technical qualifications.
Read online →Numerical findings, comparisons, and limits on their interpretation.
Read online →Study design and the pre-execution record for examining the experiments.
Read online →A separate philosophical argument, with its commitments and criticisms made explicit.
Read online →Evidence boundary. The original pilot and later factorial comparisons examine different questions. Hamiltonian rotation does not isolate locality alone. Reproduction does not establish the philosophical thesis, a spacetime metric, or a consciousness result. Read the evidence guide.
Each reader provides PDF, editable DOCX and canonical Markdown. Author-owned research, figures and data: CC BY 4.0; original software: Apache 2.0, subject to component and third-party notices. Scientific research and philosophy remain distinct from the RippleLogic decision specification.
SGP separates six questions often collapsed into one. Its purpose is not to produce a consciousness percentage; it is to govern evidence and protection under uncertainty while blocking capacity-to-authority leakage.
MPSMoral Patienthood SurfaceEvidence of welfare-bearing experience.FPPFull Protection PlateauFull rights-of-protection; every human person is FPP-100 by constitutional commitment.GPRGovernance Participation ReadinessHow a being can participate or be represented.SPRStewardship / Power ReadinessFitness for a specific consequential role.ICPIntelligence Capacity ProfileCapability and cognition, not moral worth.RMCPReality-Management Capacity ProfileIntegrated capacity to model and shape reality; capacity is not authority.Human FPP-100 is constitutional, not measured. Humanity’s collective RMCP-P100 anchor is a capacity reference, not a ranking of worth, wisdom, or legitimate power.
v7.0 complete reader and trade edition published · v6.5 retained as a historical reader
“Love, if it is going to survive pressure, needs structure.”
The book begins with lived experience and moves into the 3R doorway, MathGov 1–2, Union scopes, the five-stage cascade, worked decisions, SGP, the practice loop, and the wider philosophical horizon. It teaches the method without replacing the governing sources.
13 chapters, nine appendices and all 30 illustrations. Historical v6.5 remains available: reader, PDF, and editable DOCX, complete source package and revision report →.
Ideas for transparent public decisions, published by GFiles India. Select a card to read the original article.
From Discretion to Disciplined Judgment: evidence, protected rights, serious risks and practical viability in public decisions.
Published commentary · Original publisher linked
Read on GFiles India ↗
Public decision records that make purpose, evidence, impacts, objections and review easier to examine.
Published commentary · Original publisher linked
Read on GFiles India ↗Cards open the original publisher in a new tab. Publisher dates, attribution and applicable rights remain unchanged. Commentary is not independent empirical validation of RippleLogic.
These works deepen empirical, philosophical, and frontier questions around MathGov. They inform the research programme but do not govern the Core.
Two linked papers separate empirical claims about relational constitution from the normative move toward Union-Based Ethics.
Boundary. They do not establish universal relationality, metaphysical oneness, or MathGov effectiveness.
Qualification, moral status, action binding, successor integrity, epistemic discipline, and evidence-aware coordination across human, institutional, machine, and hybrid intelligence.
v2.4 · 44 pages · publication-readyGoverning sustained-suffering risk under moral-patient uncertainty without pretending uncertain sentience has been proved.
Working Paper v1.1 · 23 pagesA three-layer research framework for consequence-sensitive task routing under uncertain readiness. Complete as a research framework; not validated guidance.
v1.6 · 33 pagesMathGov treats its own architecture as challengeable. The appropriate next move after specification is not declaring victory; it is exposing assumptions, testing replay, measuring disagreement, publishing adverse findings, and revising only when reality earns the revision.
A framework that asks others to expose assumptions, evidence state, uncertainty, and authority should expose its own.
Verify the current evidence state: Core validation status ↗ · MHIOS validation report ↗ · AF known limitations ↗ · AF verification steps ↗ · AIAP release notes ↗
No. RLS is downstream. RG, RF/NCRC, TRC, and CSV determine which options may enter ordinary ranking. A later score cannot rescue an earlier failure.
No. SGP governs evidence and protection under uncertainty. It separates moral patienthood, full protection, participation, stewardship, intelligence capacity, and reality-management capacity rather than turning them into one “being score.”
No claim of empirical superiority is made by the current Core release. Internal release verification establishes conformance within declared tested surfaces. Independent replay, inter-rater studies, measurement work, and bounded pilots remain necessary.
No. Selection, legitimate authority, physical or causal admissibility, execution conditions, monitoring, and requalification are distinct. A consequence interface is not legitimate authority.
Release I has scoped dependency limits and no new native Excel recalculation/save/reopen certification. See the dependency record, verification report, and installation guide.
Searchable reading sites present the publications. GitHub preserves versioned sources, workbooks, examples, scoped tests, checksums, release reports, and history.
Reuse terms are collection-specific. AIAP original code and schemas use Apache-2.0; author-owned research materials use CC-BY-4.0 under its open-edition grant. Auditable Flourishing uses CC-BY-4.0. Consult each repository’s license and third-party notices.
Don’t just believe RippleLogic. Test it. Use it. Apply it. Try to break it.
Use RippleLogic on real decisions: hard trade-offs, social dilemmas, institutions, technologies, public choices, family choices, and the decisions that shape our shared future.
Challenge it hard. Find where the evidence is thin, where a gate misfires, where the burden is too high, or where a simpler method works better. Improve what can be improved. Keep what survives scrutiny.
The practical aim is simple: reduce avoidable harm, expand durable benefit, protect non-compensatory rights, and stop exporting costs to someone else, somewhere else, or some future generation.
Ground the claim, protect the floor, test ruin and viability, then compare only the options that survive. Record what changes when the method meets a real problem.
Look for omitted stakeholders, weak evidence, hidden assumptions, brittle thresholds, false certainty, excessive burden, and cases where RippleLogic adds no value. A failure found honestly is useful evidence.
Seek outcomes that protect rights and widen flourishing without shifting severe costs onto less powerful people, distant communities, other beings, or future generations.
Prosper. Flourish. Help others flourish.
That is the goal: not perfection, not obedience, and not ownership of the compass. Better decisions that remain open to evidence, challenge, repair, and learning.
Now is the time. We are Ripple Aligners.
Teaching and publication visuals explain; governing sources control exact technical meaning.