Core Logic · RippleLogic v10.6 + SGP v5.3

MathGov turns ethical intention into auditable decision logic.

RippleLogic is the core decision engine of MathGov. It asks a decision to survive rights floors, catastrophic-risk limits, and containment checks before any benefit score is allowed to choose a winner. SGP adds the moral-status interface for protecting welfare-bearing beings without confusing protection, standing, and authority.

The governing principle: do not average away rights violations, do not hide catastrophic downside, do not improve a local system by damaging the larger systems it depends on, then rank only the surviving options through transparent welfare scoring.
Release: v10.6 + SGP v5.3 Status: Tier 1–3 core foundation Core: NCRC → TRC → Containment → RLS → UCI/HOI Loop: NCAR
The map

Who matters, and what changes?

MathGov begins by refusing the false idea that decisions affect only one actor. A decision is mapped across seven Union Scopes and seven welfare dimensions.

U

Union Scopes: the “who” of impact

A Union Scope is a stable scale of impact and accountability. Stakeholder instances feed the scopes. The scopes prevent affected beings and systems from disappearing.

U1 Self U2 Household U3 Community U4 Organization U5 Polity U6 Humanity / CMIU U7 Biosphere
D

Welfare Dimensions: the “what” of change

Each option is assessed across material conditions, health, social cohesion, knowledge, agency, meaning, and environment. The 7 × 7 grid creates 49 accountability cells.

D1 Material D2 Health D3 Social D4 Knowledge D5 Agency D6 Meaning D7 Environment
Plain rule: Union Scopes do not limit who matters. They make sure every affected stakeholder can be logged, mapped, scored, protected, and reviewed.
The spine

The five-level cascade

Earlier levels determine whether an option is even allowed to continue. Later levels cannot rescue earlier failure.

1 · NCRC

Rights feasibility

Reject any option that violates a non-compensatory rights floor. Welfare gains cannot buy back rights harm.

2 · TRC

Catastrophe feasibility

Bound worst-tail catastrophic risk using declared scenario governance and CVaR. Do not let average benefit hide ruin.

3 · Containment

Cross-scale safety

Block local wins that hollow out larger containing systems such as institutions, communities, CMIU, or biosphere.

4 · RLS

Residual welfare ranking

Only after the gates pass, rank surviving options across the 49-cell welfare matrix under declared weights.

5 · UCI / HOI

Structural tie-break

If welfare ranking is non-decisive, use coherence and hollowing-out diagnostics, then escalate if needed.

Non-overlap rule: NCRC is rights feasibility. TRC is catastrophe feasibility. Containment is cross-scale structural feasibility. RLS is residual welfare ranking. UCI/HOI is non-decisive structural resolution. They must not be collapsed into one blended score.
The calculable core

Simple enough to teach, strict enough to audit.

The public page should show the minimal equations without pretending the full Canon is only a formula. The gates are the moral architecture; the score ranks only what survives.

Selectable set: A_sel = { a ∈ O : NCRC(a) ∧ TRC(a) ∧ Containment(a) }

This is the core safety filter. If an option fails rights, tail risk, or containment, it is not selectable under normal conformance.

Decision rule: if A_sel = ∅ → Emergency / fallback / redesign else a* = argmax RLS(a), a ∈ A_sel

The best action is chosen from the selectable set only. If nothing is selectable, the system redesigns, escalates, or invokes governed fallback.

Impact instance contribution: Ĩ_dir,x(u,d,a) = Σ_k [ μ_k · r_k · τ(t_k) · ℓ_k · c_k · e_k · s_{k,x} ] Saturation: I_dir,x(u,d,a) = tanh(β · Ĩ_dir,x(u,d,a))

Each cell score is built from explicit impact instances, then bounded so one estimate does not explode the model.

RippleLogic Score: RLS(a) = Σ_u Σ_d w_u · v_d · m(u,d) · κ(u,d) · I_prop,welfare(u,d,a)

RLS ranks surviving options across scopes and dimensions. Rights-covered and catastrophe-relevant cells cannot be quietly masked away.

Two-stream discipline: admissibility gates use the Base stream. SGP-derived sentience multipliers may be used only in the Welfare stream for RLS, never to weaken NCRC, TRC, or Containment.
SGP v5.3 integration

Protection is not authority.

SGP helps RippleLogic ask who is a welfare-bearing moral patient and how protection should be represented, without turning a protection score into legal status, role authority, or a consciousness oracle.

1

Protection

SGP estimates protection-relevant moral patienthood under uncertainty. It asks when a being should stop being treated as a mere tool.

2

Standing

Plateau status is constitutional full-standing, not a prestige score. Humans are plateau-bearing by non-downgrade commitment.

3

Authority

Governance authority is not an SGP output. Authority requires responsibility, competence, legitimacy, lawful role, and separate stewardship checks.

SGP layer Plain meaning RippleLogic use Boundary
SG_measured_norm Raw normalized measurement signal. Audit-visible if present. Not final protected standing by itself.
SG_norm Effective canonical individual scalar after SGP rules. May inform welfare-stream weighting. Must not alter NCRC, TRC, or Containment.
SG_patient_norm Rights-of-protection scalar, more protective where applicable. Preferred for protected stakeholder welfare weighting when available. Not a governance-authority score.
Plateau(E) Full Rights Plateau standing flag. Recognized where authoritatively reported by SGP. Cannot be inferred from raw scores alone.
Human Plateau Rule: for every human person, SG_norm(H) = 1.0 as a non-downgrade rights boundary. This is not a measurement claim and cannot be weakened by disability, uncertainty, institutional convenience, or any scoring procedure.
How a run works

Notice → Choose → Act → Reflect

NCAR is the everyday learning loop. For high-stakes decisions, the loop emits a PCC so the decision can be reconstructed, challenged, and improved.

N

Notice

State the decision, baseline, horizon, options, affected stakeholders, and reference structures.

C

Choose

Run NCRC, TRC, Containment, RLS, and tie-breaks. If the evidence cannot support the claim, refuse or escalate.

A

Act

Implement the selected or provisional action with monitoring, review triggers, and responsible roles.

R

Reflect

Compare predicted ripples to real outcomes. Update evidence, assumptions, kernels, and future practice.

What the audit record should preserve

A serious run should preserve the option set, stakeholder map, baseline, rights impacts, scenario library, tail-risk values, containment posture, cell scores, weights, masks, evidence maturity, SGP records if used, refusal records if needed, and the public rationale.

What refusal means

Refusal is a formal anti-overclaiming state. If the evidence cannot support admissibility, selectability, alignment, deployment-readiness, or conformance, the correct move is narrower claim scope, additional evidence, redesign, escalation, or bounded provisional action.

Release boundary

What this release claims, and what it does not.

Strong systems become trustworthy by refusing false certainty. v10.6 + SGP v5.3 is a core-foundation release, not a claim that all validation work is complete.

✓ Claimable now

Tier 1–3 core architecture, synchronized Canon and SGP interface, formal cascade logic, rights floors, tail-risk and containment structure, welfare matrix, audit discipline, and public release package.

✕ Not claimed yet

Empirical validation, Tier 4 readiness, ProofPack completeness, legal certification, deployment certification, machine-verifiable ecosystem completeness, completed biological SGP measurement, or current-AI sentience.

The simplest living version: choose the strongest rights-safe, tail-bounded, containment-safe action across the full ripple field, record why, watch reality, and improve the next cycle.